Sujata Rao

Create Your Badge

what i'm listening to ...

19th October 2010

Photo reblogged from It's Full of Stars with 90 notes

unknownskywalker:

How to Weigh a Star Using a Moon
How do astronomers weigh a star that’s trillions of miles away and way too big to fit on a bathroom scale? In most cases they can’t, although they can get a best estimate using computer models of stellar structure. A new study says that in special cases, we can weigh a star directly. If the star has a planet, and that planet has a moon, and both of them cross in front of their star, then we can measure their sizes and orbits to learn about the star.
Astronomers have found more than 90 planets that cross in front of, or transit, their stars. By measuring the amount of starlight that’s blocked, they can calculate how big the planet is relative to the star. But they can’t know exactly how big the planet is unless they know the actual size of the star. Computer models give a very good estimate but in science, real measurements are best.
If a transiting planet has a moon big enough for us to see (by also blocking starlight), then the planet-moon-star system could be measured in a way that lets us calculate exactly how large and massive all three bodies are. Basically, we measure the orbits of the planet around the star and the moon around the planet. Then through Kepler’s Laws of Motion, it’s possible to calculate the mass of the star.
The process isn’t easy and requires several steps. By measuring how the star’s light dims when planet and moon transit, astronomers learn three key numbers: 1) the orbital periods of the moon and planet, 2) the size of their orbits relative to the star, and 3) the size of planet and moon relative to the star.
Plugging those numbers into Kepler’s Third Law yields the density of the star and planet. Since density is mass divided by volume, the relative densities and relative sizes gives the relative masses. Finally, scientists measure the star’s wobble due to the planet’s gravitational tug, known as the radial velocity. Combining the measured velocity with the relative masses, they can calculate the mass of the star directly.
If there was no moon, this whole exercise would be impossible. No moon means we can’t work out the density of the planet, so the whole thing grinds to a halt. This method has not been put into practice yet, since no star is known to have both a planet and moon that transit. However, NASA’s Kepler spacecraft should discover several such systems.
Image: Artist’s concept of an exoplanet and its moon transiting a sun-like star. Such a system could be used to directly weigh the star. 
• Source: Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics

unknownskywalker:

How to Weigh a Star Using a Moon

How do astronomers weigh a star that’s trillions of miles away and way too big to fit on a bathroom scale? In most cases they can’t, although they can get a best estimate using computer models of stellar structure. A new study says that in special cases, we can weigh a star directly. If the star has a planet, and that planet has a moon, and both of them cross in front of their star, then we can measure their sizes and orbits to learn about the star.

Astronomers have found more than 90 planets that cross in front of, or transit, their stars. By measuring the amount of starlight that’s blocked, they can calculate how big the planet is relative to the star. But they can’t know exactly how big the planet is unless they know the actual size of the star. Computer models give a very good estimate but in science, real measurements are best.

If a transiting planet has a moon big enough for us to see (by also blocking starlight), then the planet-moon-star system could be measured in a way that lets us calculate exactly how large and massive all three bodies are. Basically, we measure the orbits of the planet around the star and the moon around the planet. Then through Kepler’s Laws of Motion, it’s possible to calculate the mass of the star.

The process isn’t easy and requires several steps. By measuring how the star’s light dims when planet and moon transit, astronomers learn three key numbers: 1) the orbital periods of the moon and planet, 2) the size of their orbits relative to the star, and 3) the size of planet and moon relative to the star.

Plugging those numbers into Kepler’s Third Law yields the density of the star and planet. Since density is mass divided by volume, the relative densities and relative sizes gives the relative masses. Finally, scientists measure the star’s wobble due to the planet’s gravitational tug, known as the radial velocity. Combining the measured velocity with the relative masses, they can calculate the mass of the star directly.

If there was no moon, this whole exercise would be impossible. No moon means we can’t work out the density of the planet, so the whole thing grinds to a halt. This method has not been put into practice yet, since no star is known to have both a planet and moon that transit. However, NASA’s Kepler spacecraft should discover several such systems.

Image: Artist’s concept of an exoplanet and its moon transiting a sun-like star. Such a system could be used to directly weigh the star.

• Source: Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics

()

Source: unknownskywalker

  1. veganfiction reblogged this from itsfullofstars
  2. murielchocula reblogged this from itsfullofstars
  3. violence-and-composure reblogged this from itsfullofstars
  4. littlerodem reblogged this from itsfullofstars
  5. annthynguyen reblogged this from itsfullofstars
  6. silas216 reblogged this from itsfullofstars
  7. letgodrop reblogged this from itsfullofstars
  8. sulfuricpower reblogged this from itsfullofstars
  9. ladyhouston reblogged this from itsfullofstars
  10. weaves81 reblogged this from unknownskywalker
  11. lexslibris reblogged this from itsfullofstars
  12. sujata reblogged this from itsfullofstars
  13. martygonhisjourney reblogged this from itsfullofstars
  14. emilythornberg reblogged this from itsfullofstars
  15. gothnina reblogged this from itsfullofstars
Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus